Over the next few weeks, I will be making a series of posts on the referendum, to encourage people to vote, and to choose Option A on 24th April. Remember you have until Wed. 3rd April to register, if you are not currently on the roll. If you have recently moved house or have just completed 2 years in the island, it is worth checking your status. You can find more info HERE.
I am pleased to reproduce below a very good letter by Grouville resident, Wayne Le Cuirot, who sets out a clear case for Option A as the only viable reform option on the table.
----------------
'The forthcoming referendum on our electoral system has seen
the debate focus on the future role
of the Constables. I do feel it needs emphasising that Option A, while
the fairest of the three alternatives, does also provide the opportunity for
Constables to stand for the States
in the six proposed
districts. They would also still be head of their parochial system to which
they would have more time to
devote towards if unelected to the chamber.
In the rural parishes a contested Constable's election is
the exception rather than the rule, indeed in the last 'General Election' three
quarters of the Constable seats
did not result in an election whilst in St Ouen the parish had its first such
election in over a hundred years.
The dual role of the Constables as
head of each parish's honorary system together with being a States member means
that most people do not feel comfortable standing for the role. Contesting an
election against a sitting Constable is still seen in many quarters as a
surprising thing to do and often intimated to be divisive and not in the
interests of the parish. Consequently comparatively few elections for the post are seen whilst
few candidates of any calibre are prepared to put themselves forward. If there
is a genuine desire for all States members to be regarded as equals, then the
ability of people to stand for such a role should be so too. While it is
difficult for a Constable to claim to have any more affinity for their parishioners
than their colleagues on the Deputy benches it can be seen that the great
majority of issues debated in the States legislature relate to issues for
the Island as a whole and any
voting system must reflect this.
The interim report handed to each household by the Electoral
Commission states 'if the
Constables are included in a system of large electoral districts, it will make
inequality of representation even worse than under the present system.' This
clearly indicates that any vote in favour of incorporating the separate
position of the Constables into the new proposals will end up with a system less representative of its people
than before! In a world that is keeping ever closer eyes on the workings of
this Island, an electoral system that results in 12/42 of the members being in
a capacity that rarely faces a contested election will be seen as a move away
from a fair and equal system rather than a reform towards one. In effect we
would have Senators who face regular elections and an Island wide mandate being
dropped altogether to be replaced by a system with a higher proportional
representation for members who do not have either.
The referendum
on 24 April can be seen as a most important election which we should all
participate in. It should not become a debate dominated by those who have most to lose and which on
election day the Constables' supporters turn out to keep them in the States
while the large majority of the rest of the electorate show their usual apathy and stay away
from the polling booths. Consequently by default we will be left idiotically with a representative system that by the
commission's own reasoning will be worse than the present one and does not meet
the requirements of the Venice Convention.
So why is such an effort being made to keep the Constables
in the States while the far more representative figures of the Senators are
being removed with barely a word? A cynical interpretation could lie in the
voting records of the Constables, three quarters of whose default setting
appears to be the backing of the large majority of proposed legislation from
the Council of Ministers. Even if
as a consequence of future changes the council were reduced by twenty percent
to eight ministers, with the combination of the eight assistant ministers and
the reliable support of eight Constables any future Council would secure an
immediate inbuilt majority by securing 24 out of the 42 members which may
be seen as a recipe for poor
government.
The problem of an improved electoral system for such a small
Island is hardly a Gordian knot of intricacy. The simplest solution is surely
Option A whereby all States members whether they be Deputies, Senators or
Constables stand in whichever of
the six already devised constituencies they live in. Whoever gets the most
votes gets elected, every elector will have seven directly elected
representatives who they could contact whenever they required and that perhaps
would be how anywhere else in the world would do it, even Guernsey has managed
to follow a similar process with success surely it is not beyond the wit of
this island to do the same.'
------
If you interested in helping to campaign for Option A, then please contact christine@theATeam.org.je
VOTE A = is the only way
ReplyDeleteVOTE B = is going backwards
VOTE C = is currently what we already have
VOTE A = it's the only way!